THIS is how you design a supermarket

Why Can’t Fremantle Have Quality Development?

The two photographs here are of a new supermarket in London. Why are they relevant to Fremantle?

Gerard O’Brien of Silverleaf, responsible for utterly forgettable developments around town, and for not keeping his promises about them, has submitted new plans for the Coles Woolstore site in Fremantle opposite the railway station, an iconic entry site deserving quality.

The plans are out for public comment, and already there are comments from Gerard OBrien that Coles and Target will leave Fremantle if they don’t get what Gerard O’Brien is going to give them, and commentary from some members of the public to ‘just get one with it’ and ‘accept mediocrity.’

Council policy guidelines already exist to guide new developments and encourage good quality, but they get ignored. If Fremantle Society members ignore this opportunity to ask for good quality, we will yet again get mediocrity.

We have just endured 30 years of mediocrity on the Coles Woolstore site, and now we are expected to put up with more.

Meanwhile in London, new developments like the one pictured above, show what can happen.

The images show a new Waitrose supermarket in an old train shed at King’s Cross, London. It features, besides groceries, a wine bar, live jazz on Thursday evenings, a coffee shop, juice bar, and a cooking school.

The Gerard OBrien proposal not only gives us a very ordinary development, with too much glass, no effort to get rid of the six mediocre little shops along Queen Street, and a Coles reduced by 1100 sqm, but there is no indication we will be getting a better quality supermarket.

British supermarkets like this Waitrose one are 20 years ahead of Australian supermarkets like Coles. Where is the discussion to get Coles to do a better job, so that the site goes from being one with one of the highest rates of shoplifting in Australia, to a destination people actually want to hang out at?

You should at least ask for something better from Gerard and Coles.

You have until 21 August to submit your comments to Fremantle Council. Details on council’s website under “Have Your Say.”

John Dowson
The Fremantle Society

Your Assets are Disappearing Fast

Last week the Fremantle Society wrote to members about Fremantle Council’s intention to sell the iconic Victoria Hall on High Street for $2 million, half of council’s own valuation. The story went viral. On the Fremantle Society Facebook page it reached over 8,000 people, and made the front page of this week’s Fremantle Herald.

This worrying story will not be going away.

The first Facebook comment, as seen above, came from one of the mayor’s supporters, the suspended Perth City Councillor Reece Harley, suggesting that the Fremantle Society should buy the hall – a ludicrous proposal trying to deflect responsibility from the current owners, the council.

In examining council documents to see what else is to be sold off by them to pay for the new unnecessary $50 million administration centre, it is alarming to see that council aim to sell a raft of ratepayer assets, for a projected LOSS of $12 million in just the next 12 months. Included in the fire sale of properties is the site bought for the new depot for $7.758 million. But it is projected to sell that site at 2 Jones Street O’Connor for a profit, at $7.8 million, a fanciful estimate given the current market (and not taking into account the hundreds of thousands of dollars wasted in buying the site and having it empty and not earning rent for years). Thus the $12 million loss is likely to be much higher. In selling previous ratepayer assets cheaply, council has already lost more than that amount already.

We gave the relevant sheets from the budget to a senior practising accountant, and this is his response:

Just looked at the council finance documents. Yep, trend to sell off properties continues & to borrow additional funds …I think originally it was to borrow $15m & has now increased to $20m. The financial statement results continue to be manipulated in relation to depreciation and loss on sale of assets. Depreciation is not shown appropriately in the monthly financial results and also the loss on sale of properties ($12m) is not accounted for in the correct period. If it was shown properly the result for FY18 would be a big loss & poor financial ratios….and bad publicity for the council.

The timing recognition of the significant loss of $12m of the properties to be sold next year is clear accounting manipulation. Under prudent accounting policies (& the council’s stated accounting policies) the loss for these properties should be recognised immediately in the FY18 profit & loss statement, and not deferred to FY19. If the auditors were stronger they should insist on this.

Time for an enquiry?

John Dowson
The Fremantle Society

The Fall of the Hall?

The Rise and now the Fall of Victoria Hall

In an ominous move from a cash strapped group, it has been announced by Fremantle Council that Victoria Hall will be sold.

Given that this Talbot Hobb’s masterpiece is a high quality example of a community hall saved several times for the community, the question must be – to be sold to whom for what?

Built in 1897 as a parish hall for St John’s Church when the dynamic Archdeacon Watkins was building a Church of England empire in Fremantle, which included also building ten cottages in Cantonment Street, Victoria Hall has been an important part of the community. It is a special property. As one observer noted: “Victoria Hall is like a Victorian musical instrument – it has wonderful acoustical qualities… you first need to know how to play it.”

Unlike today when the Church of England is invisible and impotent in the very city it owned the centre of, the church back then played an important social role. There were many uses for Victoria Hall. Between 1914 and 1930 it was used by South Fremantle Football club during the season.

As parishioners moved further out of Fremantle, the hall was leased to the Wrightson brothers for dances and was narrowly saved from demolition by the Fremantle Society in the 1970s with the help of Jack Mundey and a union Green Ban.

By 1985 it had become a Salvation Army second hand shop. When they pulled out in 1996 and a sale was mooted, a community group, the Victoria Hall Association, rallied to lease the building for community events, and Mick Vodanovich was installed as resident caretaker. That didn’t last long and the owners sought a change of use to a furniture showroom with apartments built at the rear. David Gerrand of Deckchair and John Dowson mounted a campaign against such a change of use which would not only have taken the building away from community events, but irreversibly damaged it with apartments. Fortunately Councillor David Johnston supported the campaign, and council raided their own heritage fund for $680,000 to get the money to purchase it.

The funds were taken from a heritage fund set up as a revolving fund for buying buildings, doing them up and selling them and reinvesting the proceeds in further similar projects. However Fremantle Council has not implemented that plan, and after the purchase of Victoria Hall, years of work and $2 million were required to get the building restored and ready for a new life as a theatre, a life the then council wanted to support.

Given Fremantle Council’s recent poor record at defending heritage, of allowing for example development at the nationally significant Warders Cottages contrary to the Conservation Plan, and damaging works to the Atwell and Mannings Buildings, there is no reason to believe that Fremantle Council will do anything to protect Victoria Hall from inappropriate development and use in the hands of a private owner.

There are far too few community theatres and performing spaces left in Fremantle. Victoria Hall has been saved several times in the past for the community. Who will save it now?

(thanks to Toby Leek for his colourful artistry above, and to Garry Gillard for the extensive Freo Stuff posting about this wonderful building)

City of Sharks

Fascinating book launch. Former Fremantle Society President has written a book all about Fremantle and you are invited to the launch next Wednesday July 11 at 6.30 for 7.30 upstairs at the National Hotel on the corner of High and Market Street.

Find out who the sharks are (and we are not talking about East Fremantle).

Find out about the sordid story of high rise storeys ruining our favourite town.

Remember: Wednesday July 11 at 6.30pm

Why Backyards are Important


This doesn’t look like a backyard, but it is. In the jaw droppingly beautiful heritage town of Colmar in eastern France, this is the view from a new rental apartment in a 400 year old building in the heart of town, a whole (compact) apartment rented for less than any little box in the new developments of Fremantle.

Colmar is full of these backyards behind thriving busy shops and streets in the middle of town. Just ten metres from the hectic life on the street, these serene spaces for residents abound. The plastic grass may be a touch too far, but most of the rest is real heritage, a survivor from two world wars, a town so beautful that the Germans, and even the Americans, did not bomb it.

Gerard O’Brien destroyed all the backyards of the Atwell Buildings in High Street with his new glass box, and will do the same with the backyards to the 28 Manning Buildings shops across the road. The inner city backyards of Fremantle, what little remain of them, are precious, and could be Colmar type spaces. In some places like Melbourne they graffiti them and turn them into laneway bars, and Fremantle Council is on an alcohol led recovery so could consider the same.

It is a tragedy that no councillor would listen to the Fremantle Society when we pleaded for the rear of the Manning Building shops to be treated as important spaces that could be turned into something wonderful. Instead, most of the rear buildings, including a level 1a listed building, ironically probably one of the first bicycle factories in Fremantle, will be demolished.

Backyards in the Suburbs

With Fremantle having the second worst tree canopy of any suburb in Western Australia, the fact that council has not even completed a significant tree register yet for private land, and the relentless ‘progressive’ push to increase densities, the leafy backyards of Fremantle suburbs are under threat.

When Professor Tony Hall arrived in Australia from the UK he couldn’t believe how Australians, distracted by their long working week and their desire to ‘invest’ in a large house, were giving up on the sanctity of a leafy backyard. He wrote a book about it- Life and Death of the Australian Backyard (CSIRO 2010).

Because Fremantle Council was embarking then on plans for increased density to encourage cheaper housing, and less green open space, Professor Hall was brought to Fremantle to talk to councillors and staff, but he was met with mainly blank stares. He went back to Queensland, and nowadays one of the chief complaints the Fremantle Society receives are complaints from residents of their amenity being affected by insensitive higher density. His comments apply to established suburbs as well as new housing areas.

In 2009, the Brisbane Times interviewed Professor Hall:

“I’d never seen this before,” Prof Hall told AAP from his office at Queensland’s Griffith University.

“It reflected changes in lifestyle in Australia for the worse.”

In developing outer suburbs across the country, home buyers are purchasing blocks of land to build their own home, he said.

They are encouraged by builders to construct the biggest house then can fit on the lot and the “backyard is not seen as very interesting”.

It is in the builder’s interest to sell floor space, Prof Hall said.

“New names are invented to cover all these rooms that you now have but don’t really have any function (like) activity rooms,” he said.

“You find that the situation is quite dramatic.

“Any aerial photos you find, it really stands out, you get the older suburbs – they’re covered by trees and the newer ones are all just roof-to-roof.”

Prof Hall, wrote a report about his findings for Griffith University’s Urban Research Program, titled Where Have All the Gardens Gone? An Investigation into the Disappearance of Backyards in the Newer Australian Suburb.

He said the trend took hold in the mid-1990s, coinciding with longer working hours.

“People in Australia are now working very long hours (particularly) people in the outer suburbs … (people are) working over 50 hours a week, working weekends, not taking their holidays,” he said.

“People often don’t notice the lack of outlook because they’re not there in the daytime.

“The house is designed as a supposed investment but you can’t enjoy it.”

Shrinking backyards are forcing people indoors, causing a shift in leisure activities and lifestyle choices, he said.

“It’s completely contrary to these stories of real Australia because we’re still maintaining the story of the laid-back, outdoor, casual lifestyle when in fact the reality is moving rapidly in the opposite direction.”

Backyard lovers such as kids and retirees who like “pottering in the garden” are suffering most from the shrinkage, Prof Hall said.

“Children now sit in their bedroom and play computer games.

“Generations of children have grown up without any contact with the natural world.”

There is also an environmental impact.

“There’s a huge ecological function of the planted areas around the house,” Prof Hall said.

This has an impact particularly in the Australian climate.

Big, shady trees are replaced with energy guzzling air-conditioning and rain that would nourish the garden is flushed down the stormwater drain.

Prof Hall said front yards don’t offer the security and privacy of a backyard and for maximum pleasure a backyard should reach at least 100 square metres, though design is more important.

“What is worrying is that the older suburb house with a big backyard is no longer being built in Australia,” he said.

“What is the quality of life in these places? It’s quite frightening really.”